home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: fido.asd.sgi.com!austern
- From: fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus Henderson)
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Is RTTI required if polymorphic constructor exists
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 09:36:42 PDT
- Organization: Comp Sci, University of Melbourne
- Approved: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com
- Message-ID: <4kr21b$6ar@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
- References: <4kng7f$kt9@nuscc.nus.sg>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: isolde.mti.sgi.com
- X-Original-Date: 14 Apr 1996 14:27:55 GMT
- X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
- iQBVAwUBMXJ7G0y4NqrwXLNJAQEm9gIAipNwPZRtnlLB/9tkpWjrAt2ZreOeUm8F
- PoUaPrY51lngs5aNFF9HaEKQ2XYm57aYXVu9jtSkiQYx7+qJhzk/CA==
- =yJjY
- Originator: austern@isolde.mti.sgi.com
-
- satrajit@iscs.nus.sg (Satrajit Sujit Ghosh) writes:
-
- > If a polymorphic constructor can be created as demonstrated below,
- >is RTTI really necessary, considering that it does not really provide a
- >great deal of information.
-
- No, RTTI is not really necessary. `if', `while', and `for' are not
- really necessary either, because you can just use `goto'. Like many
- other things, RTTI is not strictly necessary, but convenient.
-
- --
- Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
- WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
- PGP: finger fjh@128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
- ---
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: Try just posting with your
- newsreader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu
- comp.std.c++ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/faq.html
- Moderation policy: http://reality.sgi.com/austern/std-c++/policy.html
- Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu
- ]
-